It shows that you are unregistered. Please register with us by clicking Here
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| GM Corvette, Camaro, TransAM, Firebird, Grand National - http://vettefbodyvideo.vidiac.com |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Blowing your Doors off
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Horn Lake
Age: 28
Posts: 954
Credits: 7,824
Rep Power: 3
![]() |
Just because yours did or if you have seen one do it does not mean they all run that. I would be willing to bet the average 1992 ZR-1 would be quicker. Almost 100 more HP, less weight,less drivetrain loss with manual, and more aerodynamic.
__________________
1996 Lincoln Mark VIII LSC (Daily Biotch) 1994 Camaro Z28 (New Biotch) Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Keys in the Ignition
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Age: 38
Posts: 28
Credits: 555
Rep Power: 0
![]() |
probably so....what did the 92 ZR1 weigh in at?
__________________
Its Just a V6.... 4.3L full roller, T57 hybrid turbo clipped @ 25psi max, 50lb injectors, Walbro 255, ATR/Conley 455ci air to water intercooler, methanol injection,700R4 w/billet TCS 9/11 2800 converter, MSD Digital 6+, MSD HVC II, Blitz boost controller, K&N filter. **UnOfficial 60'- 1.65 1/4- 11.96 @112mph Other Toy-1965 F100 390 w/Syclone Turbo & 150 shot. http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2671285 |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Blowing your Doors off
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Horn Lake
Age: 28
Posts: 954
Credits: 7,824
Rep Power: 3
![]() |
I believe it is around 3400lbs with the syclone weighing about 3500lbs.
power-to-weight ratio of 1:13 for the Syclone power-to-weight ratio of 1:9 for the ZR-1
__________________
1996 Lincoln Mark VIII LSC (Daily Biotch) 1994 Camaro Z28 (New Biotch) Quote:
Last edited by mthegodfather : October 15th, 2008 at 02:30 PM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|